3/04/2015

Labor Needs a Strategy of Mass Struggle


Labor Needs a Strategy of Mass Struggle to Defeat

 the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

 and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Free Trade Deals

 

The negotiations for free trade deals between the US, Europe and the Pacific continue to proceed in secrecy and with a blackout by the mainstream media. While ostensibly branded as trade negotiations whose aim is to increase trade by abolishing tariffs, these deals are essentially power grabs by multinational corporations to remove regulatory barriers on their profits. Of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (T.P.P) 29 draft chapters, only 5 deal with traditional trade issues. The majority would strip governments, workers and citizens of health and safety regulations, environmental protections, food safety rules and other policies benefitting the public. 

 

 Because of this blackout, the public and congress itself is prevented from knowing the details of the talks. Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch reports that it is only through “leaks” of the actual negotiations that much of the information of these deals is made public.  However, over 600 corporate “trade advisors” have full access to the texts.

 

Both trade deals reveal the utter collapse of democracy in the USA and the complete subservience of both major parties to the whims of moneyed interests. Obama, who campaigned on “transparency” in 2008 and pledged to avoid secret NAFTA type deals, has signed a 2010 agreement with the other countries that keeps the negotiations secret.

 

  Proposals included in these Frankenstein like deals roll back the minimal banking regulations enacted to protect consumers. Any governmental financial regulation would be subordinated to the extreme version of a deregulated system contained in the upcoming proposals. A tax on financial transactions is not permitted.  In health care, exemptions for big pharmaceutical companies to extend patents from eight to twelve years and perhaps even longer would raise prices and restrict access to many needed drugs. The TPP weakens food standards by altering or eliminating any regulations that ban or restrict such things as pesticides and toxins so they comply with any weaker international standards. Governments would also be penalized if they offered preferences like “prevailing wages”, buy American, or “sweatshop free” since the language in the TPP says that all corporations in the countries that sign the agreement must have equal access to the public monies spent by national, state, and local governments.  Both Agreements aim to create new markets for private investors by opening up public services to privatization in critical areas such as health, education and water.

The TPP cannot be changed or modified by any new president or Congress. Once it’s signed, all modifications must be agreed by all countries.  If a new congress or president wants to sever or get out of the agreement, there is also a ten year look back period when corporations can still sue for damages.

To administer these and many more horrendous proposals, a major goal is to establish and impose “foreign investor privileges and rights” and create a private enforcement mechanism

 

through a procedure called the “investor-state” system.  This new system will allow foreign corporations to challenge health, safety, environmental laws and regulations in individual countries.  Incredibly, it will grant corporations and investors equal rights with a country’s government and above its citizens.  This means that corporations can avoid national courts and challenge governments before courts of private lawyers operating under rules of the World Bank and the UN.  These “courts” would be empowered to grant taxpayer compensation for domestic regulatory policies that corporations and investors believe diminish their “future profits.” Lori Wallach of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch has appropriately called the TPP a corporate coup d’état. 

.

 While the mainstream corporate media essentially ignores these secret trade negotiations, they also conveniently never ask why the Republicans who supposedly despise Obama and his “liberal agenda” and have majorities in the House and Senate suddenly now have total confidence in his ability to negotiate and complete these treaties.  Many Republican leaders are pushing for “fast track” authority in Congress.

 

None other than Paul Ryan, who is portrayed as one who abhors all things emanating from the Democrats and is the current Republican chair of the powerful House Ways and Means committee in Congress is quoted in the New York Times of February 7, 2015 that granting Mr. Obama fast track authority is the right thing to do, “sooner than later is my preference,” he said.  Teaming up with Ryan on the Senate side is the ranking Democrat in the Senate Finance Committee, Ron Wyden, who has joined with Republicans to push for fast track authority.

 

How can this be?  The media pundits and liberals constantly complain of a gridlocked Congress with supposed intractable ideological differences between the two parties?  It’s a phony difference without distinction and shows that big money pulls the strings of both parties and is the real power in Congress.  When the interests of capital are involved, suddenly the two parties of big business find common ground to get things done that benefit the ruling class.  After all, this Congress is now the richest in history with the median wealth of an individual member now over 1 million dollars according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The interests of the working people have no organized expression in this rigged setup.

 

The naked power of big business, the secrecy, duplicity of the two major parties and outrageous examples in these proposed trade proposals must be widely disseminated in a mass “boots on the ground” and media campaign by labor.  The AFL-CIO and many individual unions are on record as opposed to these deals in there present form and are listed with numerous other organizations who are against these deals.  But labor’s overall political strategy continues to rely on an ineffective top down inside the beltway lobbying approach rather than using its resources to educate and mobilize a real grassroots movement.

 

 Mike Dolan of the Citizens Trade Campaign summed it up in the following quote,” currently, the European movement against the TTIP is better organized in terms of protest than the U.S. counterpart, especially when it comes to turn-out, crowd-building, and militancy of messages and tactics. I was reminded of this during a TTIP demonstration in Brussels in March 2014, outside the European Commission headquarters, the windows of which ended up covered with milk. Meanwhile, in Washington D.C., the capital of the great trade hegemon and the headquarters of so many of the organizations that comprise the fair trade /coalitions, even the mobilization for a small protest during the negotiations in December 2014 was a challenge.” 

 

Given the secrecy and extremely negative consequences that will occur upon passage, one has to ask where the outrage of labor is and who do they picture as villains?  Can labor continue to defend a President, their “labor management partners” and the two major political parties that all openly advocate the surrendering of their ability to negotiate, amend and or alter a major piece of legislation? Why are the central labor councils and other union resources not mobilized with the other organizations to hold public town hall meetings across the country?  Why not picket lines at congressional and corporate offices?  Where are the union and community phone banks that can be utilized to mobilize the membership and public into action and form the foundation of a real alternative grassroots movement against the corporate takeover of our society?

 

   Because the US labor leaders are beholden to the failed policy of “labor management cooperation” and a political strategy that is conditioned on supporting Democrats, their  approach to defeating these deals is essentially a weak, bureaucratic and top down “inside the beltway” lobbying approach. It’s apparent that without organized pressure from below, they are either incapable or unwilling to mobilize its membership and build an independent movement that is not only necessary but entirely possible given the clear class nature of these corporate attacks.

 

These deals are bad not only for working people but they also essentially destroy any pretense of democracy in the US and replace it with the private rule of capitalists. Labor campaigned for and spent millions of dollars of union money to elect president Obama who returns the favor by openly campaigning for these secretive corporate takeovers and labors only response is to send an email in protest? Labor spends untold time extolling the virtues of “labor management harmony” yet their erstwhile corporate “partners” who are the real forces behind the monstreous deals continue to escape unscathed.  

 

It’s hard to gain credibility and win followers if your message is not clear. As long as the song of harmony between labor and capital is the foundation of labors strategy, its program to defend workers and defeat these trade deals will be inherently weakened.  Recognizing the incompatibility of any partnership with these capitalist forces and their political allies is the starting point for developing a real people’s campaign to stop these trade deals and move labor to an offensive position.

 

Why not start with an honest dialogue with the rank and file membership about the real face of capital and its political allies who are bent on destroying their jobs, public services, and communities with unfettered capitalism.  

 A real commitment to building grassroots power is the only foundation that can win. The ugly proposals inside these trade deals can and should be used as examples to the rank and file of why labor needs a new approach grounded in education, mobilization, and independent politics.  A labor movement that fights can win. A labor movement that partners with capital and a corrupt two party political system is destined to lose.

 

Ed Grystar

Over 40 years experience in the labor, political, peace and health care movements. Has worked as a steelworker, teacher and for a number of labor organizations. He served as President of Butler County (Pa.) United Labor Council for 15 years.

He can be reached at egrystar@aol.com

March 1, 2015